Nikon D3S 12.1 MP CMOS Digital SLR

Nikon D3S 12.1 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera
with 3-Inch LCD and 24fps 720p HD Video Capability

The Nikon D3s is a magnificent camera and I eagerness it. The monstrous margin of rabble looking at trading this camera are chatting about it's ISO and mute dispassionate abilities. Flush while there is alot more to this camera than it's meek unfinished ISO adeptness, permits saltation with it's most uncommon sequel and uncommon trading commodity.

How magnificent does it's ISO get? How about 12,800! The ISO can be pushed up to 102,400 utilizing the Hi ISO settings.

My checks - Nikon D3s distributed with the Nikkor 24-70 2.8 Lense.

I natural the camera at 400 ISO, 800 ISO, 1,600 ISO, 3,200 ISO, 6,400 ISO, and 12,800 ISO both exclusive in incorrect proficiency and external at black. I have furthermore all round the Hi 3 or 102,400 ISO location

The ISO backgrounds glimpse solely persuading up through the 3,200 chump. After that exclusive shot can a hasty wreath particle/babble up to the 12,800 ISO consequence. I would not hold up at all structure this camera at 1,600 or 3,200 ISO. BTW - Cinema buying it at 12,800 are pragmatic. They conceive completely precious. Nevertheless there is an inconsequential outcry as I said. The 102,400 natural environment conceives all kinds of babel/bite, but that should be likely. So far the movies I've take at the crowing chair somewhere turns this camera into your allocate "eventide composition" camera. It can glimpse in very inauspicious surroundings.

More on the D3s

- This camera is resistant. Over the vacations, I had it face in deceive gales, fall, and change icebox temperatures. It presented flawlessly.

- Dope knob - Hidden to the D3s and very neato. It exhibitions the newest for example f-layoff, shutter compulsion, procedure, and lasting movies on watchdog/column cloak on the impel

- Moving introspection - there are 2 whereabouts here. Singular for a support and distinct for hand-held significance. Corner this on, and you have a suggestion of what you glimpse through the viewfinder on your rest lodestar. I in person doesn't seem this a lot, but can glimpse why other ones would.

- Voluntary and ahead sedan limelight utilizing the 24-70 2.8 lenses and my 14-24 2.8 lens

- HD Cartridge at 720p

- Divine 9 fps. Ok, I existent this, and I avidity it. I rush motorsports and was under obligation by the slower D2Xs as well as the little cushion on the D2Xs

- Sensor cleanup - completed through the viand significance on the encourage recorder.

- Unspeaking tack (Which isn't that much quieter than the slightness sublime)

- 51 context Vehicle Locus knack

- FX metering reasoning (call up if you objective a DX lens on this camera, the FX apparatus with earnings your photo. It seems like a oldish parcel interior the viewfinder cropping your edges)

My Darling ongoing (well impelling and I cipher it) - The Realistic Horizon. This examines like important you would determinate in the cockpit of an airplane and not a camera, but here it is in the D3s. It is a shop that presents the creative individual the well-timed scope. Ground is this so cool? Effect apparatus from nub photography in the hills (like answer on a acclivity) to photographing motor sports on a banked oval imprints (that would be me). Here is the tea that permits photographs to have analyzed method. I could glimpse this barrack being damaged both on a support and collaboration fettered.



*Rise on cinema*

- Having prostrated more time of the year photographing in partisan light, the 12,800 ISO venue is rejoice in blowing.

- Cinema out-of-doors at night - I took movies of secret calling, roads, and some jamboree lights. Alteration is untainted as is intensity. There is some complexion/thud, but it is identical and not that negatory.

- Pictures in vaguely lit lodgings - inferior thud and the colors and power are choicest. These metaphors were vigorous too. I toggled between personal method and rubric method to fool with the gravity of area and bokeh. The brighter the stab, the less the crash/standing. (Further these are ALL positions that would have title a take observe with any other camera)

- Pictures of stars - Yup. Stars in the sky. I was really emphatic to gifting number this camera, implication it in the atmosphere and mercurial a interior pathway of stars. The explain didn't discovering that enlarged, but thanks to I did it on a delight it was still all notified lovely. (The camera selected up a lot of cloud in the sky. I design these days from the house, the photographs would be a heap worthier)

I've now soaked up well over 1,000 movies with the D3s and it is apparently the assessed camera I have owned. I am authentically sold

---------------------------

Renew on one D3s age - DPreview forums have described teeming examples of D3s with a idiotic gathering location box. They read it is a firmware bug. I have NOT had any matters and I am 2,000+ photographs into my D3s. That encompasses numerous lowlight shoots.

Olympus E30 12.3MP Digital SLR

Olympus E30 12.3MP Digital SLR 
with Image Stabilization 
with 12-60mm f/2.8-4.0 Digital ED SWD Lens 

After owning Olympus E-510 for 8 months I had been looking redirect to an upgrade to the E-3. When Olympus announced the new E-30 in November the upgrade waters became a little muddied. I poured over the differences between the E-3 and the E-30 and then waited at some of the initial Olympus reviews to come out. I foster waited to examine from the more well-known internet Olympus users and bloggers to see what they had to say. After all, they were used to shooting Olympus and had done so with most of the models presently out. Once I knew that the E-30 performed similarly to the E-3 I knew now that I had to select one over the other. Nevertheless which one?

Basically, any camera leverage will be based on a personal panache and fondness and not everybody chooses the same technique or the same camera within an approach. Got to dearest diversity!

What I understood Olympus that I already liked were the Zuiko lenses, the in body persona stabilization, the lesser, lighter (but not stingy sensation) bodies, the look feature, the live panorama, the intuitive project of the menu approach, their dust cutback capabilities, and their built-from-the-ground-up digital organism.

I chose the E-30 over the E-3 because of two core reasons:

One was the reality that the E-30 enclosed much of the innovation and performance of the E-3, but with newer technology. In the digital world, I thought that was a bonus.

The second was the actual power difference. While I think the climate sealed body of the E-3 is great for somebody who actually wills neediness it, I couldn't see myself shooting in the drop. Since I have a bit of arthritis in my hands and wrists already, the lighter body of the E-30 was a better fit for me.

My judgment on the general performance of the E-30 is that it performs just as I had hoped it would. It's steady and responsive.

The 11 direct sedan focus points were a kind flinch from the 3 points with my E-510 and after figuring out how to change from one to the other, it became appealing calm to conduct.
The superior 2.7 in broadcast was finicky, not to reveal the statement that it can incline and twirl. I person of missed the lean and spin selection from when I owned a Canon S5 IS.

I noticed a difference in the dynamic array too. I wasn't blowing out highlights as certainly as I did with the E-510. Less "blikies" are forever a good thing!

The image eminence doesn't disappoint and the 12.3mp allows for better prints.
I asylum’s used the art filters yet, but I'm clearly it'll be just one more thing that I can play around with. It definitely doesn't distract or degrade the high class you get with this camera!

If you want to upgrade from the E-4XX or E-5XX models this camera will not disappoint. If you are looking at this as a new DSLR purchase it will be a great camera for you as well.

Olympus PEN E-P2 12.3 MP

Olympus PEN E-P2 12.3 MP 
Micro Four Thirds Interchangeable Lens Digital Camera 
with 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 Zuiko Digital Zoom Lens and Electronic View Finder

Craft procedure: this camera represents comic cooperation between ransom, portability and act like rise. For those who can't take their sheer DSLRs insidious they request to take movies, this is the top camera I've originated. Clan who was cogent up from mission and shoots should get a "sound" DSLR as their predispose-up camera; this helpfulness is entirely for those who begun have DSLRs and hunting for a receive 2nd camera.

Likes:
Echoing nation, reflex, limit, notability. Precisely, you get flourishing films up to ISO 400 (and I'm choosy), and ISO 800 is entirely sympathetic. This is my like for an Annals G9, and this camera is about an uninvolved dynamic exceeding and Heaps promote.

This is an organism with compound manufacturers. I'll be convincing to incorporation folk and lenses from sundry companies contrary worrying about compatibility. Panasonic haw make a mend tang a span or two from now -- no worries, I'll dispassionate hand on it and have my lenses longing boss guy obstruction.
The 14-42 lense is surely thoughtful. I've prepared the 45-200 and pre-ordered the admirable-irregular 7-14 rocket. They all thump around about a whet. I also have a Gitzo Voyager. My outing simulated instruments lavish are terribly accepted, baby and high. Ahhhhh!

I syncs out 3rd-tailgating strobes at 1/320th of a hindmost. Very, very satisfying.
The electronic viewfinder is eloquent and expressed. I in truth like the diopter castigate.

Unbiased OK:
The autofocus isn't as endure as my promising DSLR (an Annals 1ds iii, so you name from then I gab!), but is a heck of a component large-ascend than diagnostic spire & shoots. The autozoom brannigan while rude focusing is a simpatico fasten, but in tempered-to-pin droplet Caucasian is too creaking to get manner-theatrical focal direct. An "advertisement" button would be a choice workaround, but only if it was acceptable utilized to temporarily dying the zoomed tendency and representation ingenious polestar verification.

Dislikes:
As *everybody* says, you have your famine of matchless preference at the breaks: strobe, electronic viewfinder, or out microphone chuck. Arghhh!
The USB connector is some shocking multiplicity AV / USB investment. It is NOT connected with probation USB cables. My second: don't take the narration with you on the entry, but instead wont a determine record lecturer to download films.

The array it came with is regular. Get a fanatical ingenuity group for $9. In factualness, get two! Utmost Impetus DB OLY BLS-1 Replacement Organization for Olimbos Digital Camera/Camcorder (Dejected)
I positively longing they specious a very picayune strobe for this other than the Olimbos FL-14 Treasure for Olympus E-P1 Micro Quaternary Thirds Digital Camera. The FL-14 is clean (no sway or cast, nefarious noesis), but the FL-36R is too boisterous. The firm uniformity would be totally to request a wireless push and travel the strobe bump murder-swivel.

The abuser boundary is a facile annoyed. I endorsed had to knowledge the unrefined. I unreliable this is just because I'm a Canon-mastermind, but be warned. I'm receipt shabby to it, which principally intent match into the secretive essay nourishment (you have to publish on the stretched-out residency cooking) and customizing equipment. Solitary pronounced value: lot Auto-ISO to 100-400. No upright fairness in faceted respectability at ISO 400, and you won't think if the camera swings between 100 and 400 as it pleases.

The patron edged requires you to balk the wheel commonly, e.g. to activity the f-suppress/close trade-off in "P" line. It's way too vital to outcome on the lamentation and unexpectedly adjusts a mail (e.g. ISO 100 --> 6400!). This has happened to me a, sometimes.
The bracketing fineness is overkill for HDRs. You only get to characteristic by 1 EV; you curtailment two or threesome.

(In enterprise to a staggering testing, here's an outcome-up...)
I shake hands that ISO 1600 is "mainly distinguished," but in my theorem 400 is the ace ISO that maintains the best buy into. In describe, there's totally no sound to understandable up -- even in enduring rubicund areas of the appearance. 800 and principal, you're trading off dynamic for sensuality. I determine we're wholly favorable with each other, but I could have been more total. So, here goes: this point has near-DSLR hero condition in a very immature, cute enclose. If you make prodigious prints, paste to 400 or mediocre (book that's also imperative for all but the choicest-fulfilled DSLRs); conscious manage of Detonation Ninja, et al, may frugal you to broadcast a running go 400, but you're factually roughly your rupture. ISO 1600 is ten for slighter prints, and more than number for schematic pages, etc.

For the numerically hardened, here's the blast show from Disturbance Ninja:

ISO 6400 148
My disposal of feel: 20 and under is near-unusual, 20-30 is perfectly applicable, and 40+ has issues.
And since I've written my unique day-book, I've come to be thankful the zombie-trail uninterrupted hub rubric. I have my FN hole mapped to MF (instruction focus), so I can fail carry and forwards delicate. I cold ought the camera to have a few more mappable buttons, while. I'd positively like to also get range to the unsullied remainder set start as well as the intensity of suzerainty preview. Oh, well.

Also, I please a twin-illuminant DNG Blush Plan for my E-P2. Prominent developing! I was able to take a picture of the butt on my LCD, ship the pic into Lightroom (where the strikingness is automatically commodious), and then see that the slump of my displayed dream without fail spit the respective. Refining arm. Lawful Google "dng authority threefold illuminant" to see how to do it.

As you can let skid from the above, I also built some Fuss Ninja profiles. Caress susceptible to get them at [...]
In Consummation, the finicky guy who runs epaperpress imaginary ptlens upbraid with the E-P2 about a thrust after I asked him to. I basically hassle with ptlens from Photoshop to flawless vat defamation, etc.

Sony Alpha A230L 10.2 MP Digital SLR

Sony Alpha A230L 10.2 MP 
Digital SLR Camera with Super SteadyShot INSIDE 
Image Stabilization and 18-55mm Lens

I'm a beginner DSLR addict. I won't go into a list of specifications this camera has, those can be found certainly on the sales information record for this camera on this website or from Sony. I will highlight the skin I use and like or hate.

This camera has been right what I required for knowledge photography. I did not want a lot of bells and whistle. Out of camera picture value is very important to me. I am not game to fritter time at the laptop marker processing when I would slightly be remote shooting movies.

The Sony a230 does not have live notion or film, but I did not want live scene or film capability. I have both on my superior zoom and never use it. Optical viewfinder important due to the detail that I am far sighted and find live spectacle screens not usable in 98% of my movies since I like shooting outdoor/type/landscapes the adulthood of the time.

PROS:

*Out of camera insignia/picture property is great. I devotion the colors and textures the camera produces. Again, this is a delicate preference. Exposure compensation could certainly be untouched +/-2 as well as tint saturation in the menu. I have enjoyed the black and fair out of camera fallout also.

*The GUI menu approach is relaxed to use, acquit/cool with simple to find vanguard menu settings. Because of the great GUI, I have to say that my erudition curve has been much superior over my difficult super zoom, in actuality, I rarely use the Green Zone (vehicle/specific modes) on this camera. I am with Aperture Priority or Shutter Priority and clearly experimenting with physical pasty surplus etc. VERY FUN and REWARDING. If you so want, different flush machinate options allocate you to change the present to both Black, Brown, White or Pink. (I shelter't experimented to see what is the best viewing for slim use yet, parting supply set to White evade)

*18-55mm kit lens brilliant IQ and good general viable scale to have for most photos. I dear having this eclectic approach capability that I didn't have in my higher zoom camera.

*ERGONOMICS ; BUILD: At first glance I thought it looked a little plasticly, but once I seized and examined it, misused my object. It feels resolute and well made (which was proven just when it accidentally was toppled from my dining catalog against the stun. I like to ramble, and did not want a colossal severe camera to lug around. I know this is a personal thing, but I truly like the remainder and feel of this camera in my hands, even with the additional better 70-300mm lens I purchased later for this camera, it still feels good to me.
The menu buttons on back may be too simplified/stripped down for experienced users, but I like the way they are agreed, ISO scenery is calm to reach. For culture, having excluding buttons accidentally to hit and reason frustration has been good.

*VALUE reasonably priced for those on the resources. Kit lens 18-55mm included

*OPTICAL VIEWFINDER. I adore this VF. Nice fair terse, with sophisticated vehicle focusing when it senses my eye.(this can also be bowed off if for battery rule savings, since it will launch focusing the lens if gets anything close to the consider finder, when carrying)

Camera settings are displayed through the viewfinder, helm on front of camera below the on/off force fasten allows you to change settings based on what menu sort you are on. Field of belief seems to be very good in my limited experience. 9 annoy focus points.
*Auto-Bracketing attribute. Will take up to 3 different shots with exposures shifted either 0.3 or 0.7 steps.

I can't talk knowledgeably about dynamic variety since I retreat played with those settings yet.

*Lens options. Knowing I can use Minolta A-mount lenses is the plus

CONS: 

*at sometime, possibly I will want there are more vanguard skin existing on this ideal, like an AEL change. A "gravity of grassland" more experienced users mentioned knob, but being far sighted, I have to pile the movies up on my notebook to see the sincere property of the final picture, so I typically take numerous pictures of the same thing, tweaking the settings and the angle as cover. So deepness of ground badge possibly wouldn't help me.

*Bigger monitor on back, it has a 2.7." Larger would be fussy for viewing

*Not the best frames per back on the soak at 2.5, but have to say this is not an arise for me so far. I have been able to get some descent bird in trip pictures. I don't naturally dash fair dealings, except for baseball.

*Like any camera, low light situations are a challenge. In low light, the vehicle focus has a hard time. Some patience and experience/or in my case, tribunal and blunder is desired. I find if I switch to handbook focus and guide fair residue settings the helps. Having the right lens perhaps also helps. I have 2 lenses at this thrust, neither are genuinely destined for low light/night use. I newly successfully worn the on-enter bulletin using rear sync or plug, manual sallow total settings set to daylight, ISO set to 800, to take a careful likeness of my wife at night by a campfire. This was the BEST outdoor nightfall study shot I have ever taken to time! I was evidently in the precise range for the on-slat explode, and accidentally through experimentation got everything right! After pleasing this shot, I would say that ISO 800 or below is where the best view value will be for this camera. An accessory flashed will be in my hope, so the ISO capabilities will possibly develop if I do that.

*Proprietary array. Expensive and only found at stores that transmit the a230/a330/a380.Won't be able to find the sequence at the district hardware amass or even electronics deposit if they don't pass this line of cameras or camcorders that use this series.

There are no unspoiled cameras, but the Sony a230 has exceeded my expectations thus far.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 12.1MP Digital SLR

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 12.1MP 
Digital SLR Camera with Lumix G Vario 
14-45 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH Mega OIS Lens (Black)

I had certain I required to stride up to an opening turn DSLR camera. So I ongoing looking and had completed on the new Canon Rebel T1i at first. I bought the camera, took it home and ongoing snapping a bunch of pics with it only to determine that at round bulkiness, the pics were a tiny delicate. For a $900 camera, that wasn't something I wanted to covenant with. Yes, I am informed the pics can be doctored after the fact but I don't necessity to must do that with the mass of my pics.

So I returned the T1i and started belief about the Nikon D5000, Pentax K20D, Olympus E620 and the Panasonic G1. The K20D is a good camera but was a tiny giant for my love. After treatment the Olympus E620 I didn't come away impressed (didn’t feel fussy in my hand). I liked the Nikon D5000 and gave that camera honest consideration. However at the finish of the day, the G1 felt fussy in my hand and impressed me with its skin. I'll lean details next.

The effects that sold me on the G1 are as follow:

1. Camera are small mass and hysterics well in my hand
2. Terrific articulating LCD with great resolution
3.Super rapid sedan focus in live scrutiny manner, best I have seen
4.Has all the direct and features of most note balanced DSLRs
5. Taking excessive pics
6. Relatively rapid process
7. The "rubber like" touch of the camera body feels finicky
8.Performing well in low light and small pics up to ISO 1600 are usable while not as trivial as the best record steamroll DSLRs
9. Electronic View Finder earn
10. Auto focus assisted light

Of coursework there are some Cons as well:

1.Low light performance not as nice as best access altitude DSLRs. Although this should be estimated with the junior antenna.

2. Would be nice if the display popped up automatically

1. Limiting selection of lenses since the micro one thirds layout is so new
2. Is calm to blockade the sedan focus help light while holding the camera
3. White Balance inside under fluorescent lighting is destitute. However you can by hand adjust this.
4. It is steep in food (I paid over I tending to admit), although Amazon's charge is reasonable in my outlook and a more valid penalty situation. It means the $650 worth.

The cons I have listed are actually minor. It is a great camera and I am happy I sure to go with it. I have always liked Panasonic's picture condition. If there bags of light I have found that Panasonic cameras take as nice a picture as anything moreover out there. It is a great conduct camera that has all the performance of the doorway plane DSLRs without the bulk. I am anxious to see what the potential has in amassed for the micro one thirds configure.

If you are looking for a camera that is a tiny minor than the entry amount DSLRs but has all the performance, this is the camera for you. Its live stance performance is top level and the picture feature is impressive (even DPreview spoke decidedly of the G1's picture feature). I am anxious to get the 45-200mm zoom lens to see how it performs also.

Olympus PEN E-PL1 12.3MP Live MOS

Olympus PEN E-PL1 12.3MP
Live MOS Micro Four Thirds Interchangeable Lens Digital Camera
with 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 Zuiko Digital Zoom Lens

What do you get when you take Olympus PEN and mix it with a stripper (Of course I mean someone who strips features from a camera). You get the E-PL1 camera which is a little bit of a diverse bag. On the one hand you have one of the best versions of the m4/3 antenna to court. From what I have read it is better than, both the E-P1 and E-P2 sensors. It is hard to tell the difference at normal divider and printing resolutions and I take a picture at its entirety and doesn't pixel twitter so I cannot verify that. What I can say is this camera is qualified of producing world seminar similes. Additionally, this camera has the Olympus JPEG engine which is regarded in the company as one of the best. This camera is also relatively small and light and includes a satiate glisten. Additionally, it has vision stabilization (IS) built into the camera. It is not pocketable and the mass of this camera has more to do with the lens that it is wearing then the actual camera itself.

On the other hand, you have a camera that is thick to focus. It appears to me that it zooms to infinity (and outside) and then catches the focus on its way back in. If you are pleasing films of evermore-in-shift kids you can be clearly you will forget fairly a few positive moments. Additionally, the camera lacks the most important camera regulate there is. This is the organize sweep worn to change exposure, orifice, and secure settings in a nimble able conduct. Instead the camera uses buttons which is a clumsy way of making these changes. Most higher end Point and Shoot (P+S) cameras have some story of this contain veer. I think someone transitioning to this camera from a DSLR or high end P+S will be frustrated by this. I've seen this payable as a good thing as there are minus joystick to get puzzled over. That may be so but all m4/3 cameras can be used as goal and wound by just custody in the intelligent Auto (iA) form. This simplifies the menu options and takes great cinema maturity of the time.

I think for someone who needs to stride up from a P+S to take better Image Quality films but tactics to lodge in the iA approach 90% of the time, then this camera will complete you well and will take some amazing imagery.

Anyone, who has a E-P1or E-P2 who want the sensors with a weaker Anti-Aliasing filter (i.e. less specify flummoxed to the AA filter) and a pervade blaze will have this camera for the IQ but will perhaps be frustrated with the injury of the restraint sweep

Anyone moreover stepping up from a high end P+S such as the LX3, S90, or G11 will be impressed with the similes, but not blown away by the difference, unimpressed with the P+S focus performance, and frustrated in the P, A, S or M shooting modes. Additionally, you will be unimpressed with the superior volume of the camera but will enjoy the flexibility if your funds include other lenses.

Anyone, getting this as a minute stock around camera to a DSLR, will be exultant with the slighter mass and burden but gloomy with the slower performance. And frustrated by the clumsy gearshift but cheerful with the film capabilities.
If you don't necessary or want the cassette, don't brain IS in the lens instead of the camera, and can put up with a small decline in you IQ, ISO, and JPEG performance, then the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 12.1MP Digital Camera with Lumix G Vario 14-45 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH Mega OIS Lens (Red) offers many upgrades at the same charge (Integrated 1.4mp EVF, Swivel Screen, 460k select, Grip for bigger lenses, quicker focus performance, etc.)

For the same price, the newly announced G10 matches the E-PL1 with record, and new processing engine (annoyed your fingers for a JPEG improvement). Additionally, it has a 2kp EVF (I'm not reliable how effective that will be), a grip, a restrain swing, a 1/4000 close race and earlier focus performance. It does not have in-camera IS.

For those expecting getting the EVF at some advantage or with an ~$200 superior budget, verify out the newly announced G2. Take the G1, add 720P 60/50fps film, an enhanced processing engine, a new dial to change focusing modes, converge monitor controls that look to work as polished as an iPhone, and touch show focus, and you have a genuinely really good chubby featured camera.
Here is a fast and soil incline of pros and cons of the E-PL1

Pros:

 - The best Olympus implementation of the m4/3 sensor

 - One of the best JPEG engines in the subject

 - Relatively small and light

 - Built in show

 - In camera Image Stabilization (IS)

 - Price (The cheapest m4/3 yet)

 - Optional EVF (A very kind 1.4mp piece but very pricy at $279)

 - Its vacant

 - Nice construct condition

Cons

 - Slow Auto-focus (Panasonic has this figured out. Olympus, not so much)

 - Missing Control Wheel slows down orifice, shutter, and exposure changes

 - Only 230k check?!

 - 1/2000 shutter race?! A lot of P+S go to 1/4000

 - Locking lens is maddening to organize and cram

Overall

A competent and nice camera that will take stunning similes. Slow autofocus and clunky controls will make this camera frustrating to many people.

Nikon D700 12.1MP Digital SLR

I am making this study of the Nikon D700 from the perspective of somebody who also owns a Nikon D300.
Without qualification, the Nikon D300 is a superb camera. So many superlatives have been worn with the D300 that I will not duplicate them here. All the superlative worn with the D300 applies regularly well to the D700. I will add however that as good as the superlatives may have been with the D300, the D700 deserves a bit more.

Let me explain.

The Nikon D700 is equipped with an occupied framework FX antenna (36.0 x 23.9). This is the same antenna worn by the Nikon D3. Nikon D3 12.1MP FX Digital SLR Camera (Body Only) The D300 on the other hand uses the APS-C antenna (23.6 x 15.8). Both the D700 and the D300 have about the same 12 megapixel rating (with the D300 actually vaguely elevated).

The D700 having a superior antenna than the D300 but with about the same megapixel rating means that the amount/pixel density of the D700 is much poorer than the D300. The ratio is 1.4MP/cm2 vs. 3.3MP/cm2 for the D700 and the D300 respectively. A sink ratio means junior sound and this ratio nepotism the D700. For the D700, this translates to slash clattering in capturing the same aura than when with the D300.

The D700 decrease sound copy in revolve translates to the D700 being able to start at a superior ISO intensity than the D300. The D700 can start as high as ISO 25,600 while the D300 can go up to ISO 6,400. It is of course utterly unusual to discharge at such high ISO as it will forever be better to shot at a decrease ISO rating. Nevertheless if both the D700 and D300 were shooting at the same ISO, the D700 will have drop clatter levels. Simply put, the senior ISO capability of the D700 versus the D300 shows the superior equal of performance of the D700's antenna vs. the D300.

My actual use validates this theoretical benefit. I noticed that while the clamor rank of the D300 is very good at ISO 1600 and even 3200, the D700 consistently showed drop noise glassy than the D300 shooting at the same ISO locale and light situation. This is most noticeable when shooting at night with many lively lights in the edge of the central matter.

In provisos of blush rendition, I have not noticed any significant differences between the D300 and the D700 in the imperfect time that I have been with the D700. It may be due to the verity that I have conducted my assess at twilight and at night.

When with the D700, the stuffed support antenna means that one wills not necessity to transfer the central piece of the lens by a feature of 1.5x. So a 50mm lens will be a 50mm lens for the D700 sooner than its 75mm equivalent when worn with the D300.

While this may begin to be a disadvantage on the telephoto wall, its obtain on the large position boundary is considerable and can only be described as an eye starter. The D700 gain in ample slant application does not just come from its wider perspective. Rather, it is how the D700 maximizes and makes chubby use of such excellent lens as the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 that makes retail the D700 such an eye starter.

The resultant similes broad with the Nikon D700 and the Nikon 14-24mm are clearer, sharper and crisper compared to the D300 even when the main piece in the D700 is zoomed out to its equivalent in the, the D300 (21mm in D700 and 14mm in D300). Vignetting is not noticeably shoddier even when the D700 is used with the 14-24mm goblet copious open at its widest important chunk (14mm, f/2.8). This is surprising considering that the D700 is now using the rounded lens instead of just its obliging sign in the seat (which would have been to the help of the D300 due to its APS-C antenna).

It is not just the large direction lens that benefited from the D700. Even the minor vignetting I noticed with my 85mm f/1.4 shot with the D300 at f/2.8 is not considerably worse in the D700. I am very shocked at this rather unexpected outcome as I had projected the reverse. At any regard, vignetting is obviously corrected in publicize-processing.

Still, I should add that for place to trap serration (such as in landscape photography), the D700 with its full-form sensors will be more demanding on the lens than the D300 with its slighter APS-C antenna.
As to the mean differences between the D700 and the D300, while these two models are almost equal in variety, the D700 is slightly heavier than the D300. This is not a broadcast for me at all.

What tilts the settle in support of the D700 is its stance finder which is significantly brighter and better than the D300. This difference is very noticeable when switching from the D700 to the D300 and secondary versa.
This much better viewfinder however is a mixed blessing. One disadvantage that the D700 has over the D300 is that the D700 viewfinder captures only 95% of the copy while the D300 viewfinder captures 100% of the aura shot. So the actual spectacle captured is slightly superior to what appears in the D700 viewfinder. I understand that this resulted from proper the larger feeler from the D3 into the body breadth of a D300. Given the better idea eminence of the D700 viewfinder and the better trait of its movies, I am agreeable to work with this disadvantage and minimally compensate for it during actual use. Nevertheless I trust that Nikon corrects this while in its next iteration of the D700.

The D700 has a lead over the D3 as it has integrated jiffy which the D3 does not have. The integrated blaze is extremely positive when used with the other components of Nikon's Creative Lightning System.

The Nikon MB-D10 Battery Pack Nikon MB-D10 Multi Power Battery Pack for Nikon D300 ; D700 Digital SLR Cameras from the D300 hysterics the D700 rightly well. This is very convenient as I can opt for a lesser and lighter embalm when I do not neediness the MB-D10 for high-tempo shooting. This is one gain that the D700 has over the D3 where the sequence pack is integrated with the camera. Nevertheless a D700 with a MB-D10 is larger and heavier than a D3. And even when the D700 is equipped with a MB-D10, the D3 is still faster. This makes the D3 a better entity for sports photography.

Since I point generally likeness, unique measures and landscape and seldom spurt sports, the D700 is absolute for my needs and I can do lack the D3. The D700 junior estimate tag means that I can get the D700 with at slightest one of Nikon's professional lens.

Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G ED AF-S Nikkor Wide Angle Zoom Lens
Nikon 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S Zoom Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras
Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED AF-S Nikkor Wide Angle Zoom Lens
Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR Zoom Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras
Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Lens - New, estimated emit by Nov. 2009
Nikon 135mm f/2.0D AF DC-Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras
Nikon 85mm f/1.4D AF Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras
Nikon 50mm f/1.4G SIC SW Prime Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras

Ideally, the D700 should not be used with the DX lenses. This said, it is possible to use the DX lenses with the D700. The D700 makes the knobs to DX lens automatically lacking require to fiddle with any manage. Because the DX lens covers only a part of the D700 feeler, the highest resolution of using a DX lens on the D700 is only 5.1 megapixels. This minor coverage is automatically delineated by a box in the D700 viewfinder. Besides the sink resolution, the extremist two tops of a zoom lens are not usable. Within these limitations, the D700 can use DX lens and produces very good pictures albeit on a slighter resolution / summary sort.
The D700/FX (1.0x thing) and the D300/DX (1.5x cause) effectively doubles my lens option. For those forecast to own both the D300 and the D700, it would be prudent to desire a goblet that would be usable with both bodies.
In final, I judge the D700 a good compliment to my D300. Except for my Nikon 18-200mm DX lens (which I bought for my Nikon D200), all my glasses and accessories for the D300 can be used with the D700 at its full resolution. I will use the D700 in those time when I poverty the best fallout shooting ample turn and/or at high ISO hurry. In the period when I neediness the especially touch, the D300's 1.5x crop issue makes the best use of my telephoto lenses.

I last to use both the Nikon D300 and the Nikon D700 and regularly convey both together when I go out to direct. In those times when I just make one camera body, I elect the D300 when sort and upper pixel density is a main affair (bec. Of the 1.5x crop cause stimulate on the topic of view due to the lesser APS-C antenna but with resolution still at 12megapixel). The D300 is an excellent camera and its 1.5x feature is very nearby when I should to touch out with a 70-200mm f/2.8 zoom or with my 180mm f/2.8 best without indigence of using a teleconverter. For almost every other order, including portrait, landscape and low light photography however, I find myself reaching out for the D700.

After over 3 and the half months of use, I can carefully say that the affect vigor of the D700 is significantly much better than the D300. The limit of ensign, the blush niceties, the unstable shade of flag, and the dynamic range that the D700 is gifted of capturing is considerably better and richer than what the D300 is adept of. This gained is best appreciated when winning portrait and landscape photos. The difference in dynamic range is especially noticeable when shooting at higher ISO settings as noise imposes considerable limits on the dynamic range possible. The D700 is clearly better than the D300 on dynamic range at high ISO settings.
One other difference I should remark between the D300 and the D700 is the difference that the antenna bulk has on real wisdom of ground. The better the antenna, the shallower the deepness of turf while the smaller the sensor, the superior the extent of prevent. Point and kill cameras with miniature-sized sensor often have the supreme intensity of handle.

The D700, having a bigger full-casing sensor, has a shallower wisdom of turf than the D300 (which has the smaller APS-C sensor) at the same crack venue given the same equivalent lens important part. The difference in the operative intensity of domain is about one rest. At the same equivalent focal length, the equivalent intensity of pasture of a D700 at f/2.0 would be a D300 at f/1.4.

The shallower wisdom of arena of the D700 would be a bonus to a customer who would like to segregate a specialty and obscure the background. The deeper depth of field of the D300 would be a plus to a customer who would like to keep several subjects at difference distances in focus. I use the D700 where I must to isolate a focus, distort the background, and get the best bokeh. This looked is most noticeable when shooting at thick open apertures from f/1.4 to f/2.8. This, plus the paint plus of the D700, makes the D700 my preferred body for shooting portraits.

Finally, one difference I notice between the D700 and the D300 is that the D700 has a better damped secure emit fasten. I find that it is easier to release the shutter in the D700 than in the D300. This makes a big difference when shooting at low shutter speeds.

Panasonic DMC-GH1 12.1MP

Panasonic DMC-GH1 12.1MP
Four Thirds Interchangeable Lens Camera
with 1080p HD Video

I rattling have Panasonic has fruition leading far-reaching fully uncommon with this "mixture" camera, while about whether the expand/still capabilities covetousness be message it to you bourn depend on how you longing to rocket.

This is my elite DSLR-like camera, but the transition has been halfway seamless after owning singular intimation and shoots, consumer-merit camcorders, and a film SLR over the living. I've had the Japanese variety for nearly digit months now, conquered 21,000 photos and abounding hours of disc, and have only base more reasons to revel in it, although a few fine flaws.

Clue mark astonishingly perk, rivaling the APS-C feeler DSLRs from Nikon and Rule (Imaging Store has some piquant comparisons rail the Nikon D5000 and Principle T1i). Imagery cultivated moiety well in likewise ISOs, still feeler hubbub is a prohibitive at woebegone-chipper shots buying it at ISO 1600 and large-scale, with sometimes contemplative feeler tumult unconcealed in bands across stomping grounds, unaccountable areas of an epitomize. Luckily, sensor clamour is much minus of a proceeds shooting HD disc in unjust royal, leveled at ISO 1600.

Videotape converge dream... In the natural hands. Having only owned mid-see to, consumer-cartel camcorders in the life, my astuteness of shooting disc is markedly minimum, so I've mostly lick in Well-Rounded Vehicle suit, which has worked superbly for my reservation videos. The outline standardization (still alas lense-supported), planed auto-focus, grappling and AF tracking are lifesavers for the untalented videographer, and award extremely welfare the complete fossil. Still, the GH1 is NOT a capable camcorder, and so greed not invest as screamin' (while bequeath counterpart up admirably to a consumer-grade camcorder). Save you truly neediness 1080/24p, 720/60p is a, much grow revise alternative for disc, as it takes up minus room, has a wider get ready equivalent, and is of further singularity with fewer densification artifacts. The "hurt accumulation toll" fruit that H. Massey mentioned is based on an imperfect/ungrounded acumen of HD vinyl marshal and in-camera compression; the oft-quoted 17 mb/s illumination assessment relish not perturb the rectitude of the recording ([...]). Corporal reunited is very eye-popping with the built-in biaural mic, but you've got the choice to cooperate a, much better mic into the stereo replenish-in dinero.

I indeed cotton to the exertion of the camera. The hulk and sway throw in me to voyage around, and wax for a whole-length month irrecoverable air its bridle or bulk around my caboodle (and I am an admittedly wavering and trifling countess). The articulating LCD is remarkable for framing the discharge industry wandering tedium, and both it and the EVF have amazingly pleasurable element densities and temperament duty that destination instantly smoothness (still not utterly except) doubts about the wish of an optical viewfinder. Utterance of which, though peeking into the EVF tip end you vanished in a queasy way at highest, it is VERY proficient after more intent. It gains nicely in toppled-mini, though it tip be very uncalled-for if you dress't have enough blest to rationalize a govern (the non-inflamed biddable). It's beginning-rate for tiredness-uninhabited shooting at a dark musical functioning, but shooting provocative subjects past in the period makes me thirst for an optical viewfinder.

The gearshift on the camera drudgery as projected, though the grub strategy is an ingredient of a society. The star handout changes based on what progress club via the, the numbers selector, which is disorienting at first, but makes know leading speed clue. Unfortunately, Panasonic is nowhere near Canon in the readiness of refreshment designs, and you avidity be mandatory to espy through a kinda unattractive 6-tender snack for perfect options. There is a phenomenal slop that displays the promote 5 options you reached, which should comfort the resentment wash a member.

All in all, I've fix the GH1 to be an incomparable camera. As somebody who likes to unsparing gait and shoot, it has been outstretched for framing shots promptly and capturing half a dozen pictures hidden dropping out of swiftness. The cartridge capturing capabilities have also gotten me fierce in cartridge more than any of my camcorders ultra has. Videographers due to taking into still picturing may for as much as destitution to reason this camera as well. Fine with the gifted rush lens, it's a mattering much outfit that pass out keep on me a looonnng interval misplaced upgrades (very enjoyable on my issue, although the starting advantage in the billfold). I'm giving it 4 stars because, although my flame for it, it can Yea subject matter some improvements before I jump squawk its praises off rooftops.

Nikon D60 10.2MP Digital SLR

D60 is the upgrade for D40x which I owned previously. The differences between two are too small to excuse upgrading from D40x. If you own D40 and would like more resolution then D60 may fit the receipt. For D40x owners only truthful gain is the VR lens which is perhaps only vaguely better than the non-VR one that comes with D40x (for the zoom series of 18-55mm). Off course I am not forgetting D-Lighting which is a, much touted figure but I didn't see noticeable difference in condition. Using Active D-Lighting makes the camera take longer to except cinema. It could take a few seconds before you can review the photo on LCD.


For people looking for their first DSLR camera, D60 is a great superior. It is very cool to use and provides brilliant similes lacking requiring a lot of practical skill. Actually the images I shaped with my D60 (and D40x) were better and sharper than everybody else in my photography panache (with students with anything from compact and partly-pro feature and point cameras, Canon XT and XTi and Olympus E-510). It doesn't have live survey which I would've liked because I mean to use stand for a lot of my shots. Like its predecessors, it doesn't have an auto-focus motor in the body so your lens selection is limited but for a beginner that shouldn't be a supply. It would've been kind to have advanced flaunt sync haste but hey you can't have it all. I have no regrets about wholesale D60 (I had a bunch of unused gift cards from Christmas so I didn't have to pay a lot from my pinch).

Here is my opinion for you: If you are looking for a painless to use DSLR which take superb photos and can give it then buy it. I would definitely advice D60 over D40x (unless you are cutback a pair of hundred dollars or more). If you are on a budget then go with D40 which is a brilliant camera and should now be even cheaper.
If you import this camera (or D40), I extremely endorse receiving 55-200 VR lens which is around $200. Add that to the kit lens and flummox in a SB-400 or SB-600 spark and you'll have a set up that is hard to beat for about a massive. D60 is a lot of camera in a small body.
After having the camera for a few months, I still fondness it. It produces pictures as good as, or better than Canon's new Xsi and for a lot fewer. At around $630 for the kit, it is a great pact.

Nikon D40 6.1MP Digital SLR

The 6 Megapixel Nikon D40 is embattled for those who want a relatively compact and light camera yet having most of the important SLR skin. The D40 is priced reasonably (cheaper than D50/D80 and Canon Rebel XTi). I thought, if you are still considering, whether to get a goal and wound camera or a DSLR, the D40 will be a better wealth than any headland and discharge camera, by far, even those with 8MP or 10MP.

Nevertheless if you are already deciding to get a DSLR or you want more running of the picture pleasing experience, then I would advocate you to also suffering the D50 and/or D80 first before deciding to buy the D40. I want you to make trusty that you know what you will get (and not get) with the D40. Don't get me wound although, the D40 is an awesome camera, and I don't think you will lament trade one. There are some limitation with the D40 which shouldn't nuisance most people, for example, the D40 doesn't have committed close to change picture trait, ashen residue or ISO settings (which normally only professional/enthusiast will mind). Once you understand (and accept) its limitation, the D40 is a heady and exciting photography apparatus.

Just like all its (DSLR) siblings, the D40 powers on instantly and take films with almost no close lag which are the major advantages of a DSLR over a stage and show camera. Besides the P,S,A,M form, the picture trait of the sedan settings (auto, daughter approach, landscape etc) are also very good. With 2.5 frames per jiffy you can capture society grow in sports like football, basketball, baseball etc. Also great to photograph your family or infant (newborn manner). The D40 is a great all around camera.

Some notable new features:

1. Auto (no bulletin) approach. Without this means the moment will pop-up (on all other pre-programmed form) even when you don't want to use sparkle (which can be maddening). The domestic exhibited will not pop up automatically with the P,S,A,M settings.
2. In camera controlled capability such as black and white, sepia and some filter things etc. While sounds gimmicky, these features are dexterous especially for those who doesn't have Adobe Photoshop (or other aura control software).

To meeting, D40 is the token and lightest among all the Nikon DSLR (even minor than the Canon Rebel XT/XTi, however the D40 is more ergonomics). I suppose that choosing a camera that hysterics comfortably with your hands is important. Therefore, I counsel people to suffering the camera before retail (even if you want to buy online, gratify do go to a natural stow and adversity the camera first when potential).

The D40 has only 3 (horizontal) auto-focus summit (5 for D50 and 11 for D80). If you know "The Rule of Thirds," the additional AF points above and below the inside focus goal (presented in D50 and D80) are handy to help found the horizontal third line. However, the 3 horizontal AF purpose in D40 is still useful to establish the vertical third line. Also one can focus with the midpoint AF position and after the focus brace then move the enclose upwards/downwards to make the horizontal third line. Just make certain the exposure parallel is still accurate when you move the support after you padlock the focus.

About the 18-55mm II AF-S kit lens: A good lens producing promptly photos (however not a very swift lens). Also straight for close-up/macro photography. Lens uses internal focus technology and focusing setup is silent. A very correct kit lens.

Lens compatibility: Notice that with D40, auto-focus behave will not work for non AF-S/AF-I lens. If you already have non AF-S/AF-I Nikon lenses and want a backup or replacement camera, you will be better off business D50, D70s or D80. If you buy the D40, it will be convenient for fuse with AF-S and AF-I nature lenses. I'm not really why Nikon show this course for the D40 (whether to allow lesser dimension camera or from now on Nikon will only make AF-S lens compatible camera). There are a lot of good Nikon AF-S lenses

(outlay scale added: low, average, high) that are entirely compatible with the D40 such as:

- Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX (L)
- Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S (M)
- Nikon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED AF-S DX (L)
- Nikon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED II AF-S DX (L)
- Nikon 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G ED IF AF-S DX (L)
- Nikon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S DX (L)
- Nikon 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED-IF AF-S DX VR (M)
- Nikon 55-200mm f4-5.6G ED AF-S DX (L)
- Nikon 55-200mm f4-5.6G ED AF-S DX VR (L)
- Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S VR (M)
- Nikon 12-24mm f/4G ED IF AF-S DX (M)
- Nikon 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S (H)
- Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S DX (H)
- Nikon 28-70mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S (H)
- Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR (H)
- Nikon 105mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR Micro (M)

- And numerous other exclusive prime tele/zoom lens like 200-400mm, 300m, 400mm, 500mm, 600mm.
High priced lens ($1000+) are commonly pro rank lens which regularly have better construction, closer (f-finish), and emit better attribute picture. However, often times, minor estimate lens will perform your needs just okay. I think it is important to know what you want to use the camera for before deciding which camera and lens to buy.

Image eminence of the D40 is very good which is #1 cause that I look for in a digital camera.

Here are the pros and cons of the D40 I thought:
Pros:
1. Nice out of the camera result picture quality
2. Affordable rate
3. Compact extent and light mass
4. Large and dazzling 2.5 crawl LCD
5. 2.5 frames per support
6. B/W, Sepia, some more in-camera cutting features.
7. Instant intensity on, rapidly auto-focus and no close lag

1. Noise is acceptable at high ISO settings. Auto ISO settings presented.

9. Great 18-55mm II AF-S kit lens.

1. Great array life (400+ on a separate dash. 1000+ if rush is not worn).

11. Auto (trice off) manner presented
12. 1/500 speed sync
Cons:
1. No direct knob to change QUAL, WB and ISO settings

1. Grip comfortably but might be a bit too small for some people

3. No top LCD and no front dominion dial

1. Auto-focus will not work with non AF-S or non AF-I lenses (such as the 70-300m G and 50mm f/1.8D lens)

5. No AF/MF control (have to use the swop on the lens)
6. Only 3 auto-focus face

1. 6 Megapixel (More Megapixel desirable to emboss superior to 12 X 18 at 300 dpi)

8. No night landscaped mode in pre-programmed settings

1. No in camera image stabilization (like Sony and Pentax) but Nikon has lenses with it (VR).

10. No deepness-of-meadow preview badge
In conclusion, the D40 is whole for those who want high quality pictures, more control (than a point and film camera), and have a DSLR experience (immediate potential on and no shutter lag), without having to involve an unwieldy camera. And, unless you are shooting sports/actions professionally (which nearer focusing notebook, nearer frames per second and larger memory barrier might be wanted), the D40 is beautiful much all you will should.